What do you think about Neville McNaughton's Comments?*



Please tell us if you are a
Dairy product manufacturer 
Dairy marketer/importer/exporter
Milk producer
Supplier to manufacturers


*Comments will remain anonymous. 
Cheese Reporter retains the right to publish anonymous comments to continue the discussion of this editorial.  Comments do not necessary reflect those of Cheese Reporter Publishing Co. Inc.

 

 

 

Cheese Contest Judging: A Reflection

Leading Cheese Contest Grow in Different Ways

Volume 132, No. 6, Friday, August 10,  2007

With the completion of ACS (the American Cheese Society) Cheese Contest it is time for reflection. This year contest entries were 1,208 in number covering producers with very small production up to the mega companies who produce products by the truckload. 

It was bigger in number than the WCMA (Wisconsin Cheese Makers Association), whose national contest earlier this year was 1,158. 

Cheese contests are popular these days and valued by those who receive awards, those who distribute, those who sell and those who consume. 
Both contests have emerged as credible organizations who bestow accolades on cheeses that the typical US consumer could not because they are the new consumers of award-winning cheese. 

For many years mainstream cheeses such as rindless Cheddars have won awards even as they traveled down the slippery slope of low-cost industrial production. Today those same cheeses are struggling for recognition among a new tier of production, rinded cheeses. 

This trend is in part the result of the appreciation of the judges, not the consuming public. As I reflect on this I realize that I along with fellow judges at both contests are responsible for this, a rather humbling thought. 

During the heyday of the industrial era (which is still with us) the cheeses were a reflection of the highest quality cheese possible from the system as it stood. The cheeses that are emerging today as winners reflect cheeses that are the result of the pursuit of excellence in gastronomy leaving behind the excellence in sustenance. 

Let me explain. The cheeses that were the best of the lot up until recent years were low-cost industrial output that were the mainstream of consumer consumption, cheeses enjoyed by the common man. 

Today’s winners are not so. The Leelanau Cheese Company is a small operation in Suttons Bay in northern Michagan. Far away from a body of population who the demographic specialists would consider able to afford cheese with a price tag per pound of $10.00-$15.00 per pound, the company is sold out. Leelanau Cheese Company makes a better mouse trap and the world has flocked to their door. 

While all of this is OK for those who are looking for great cheese and can afford it on a daily basis or those who want to entertain and impress friends and share with a suitable libation, these contests are leaving the mainstream behind. The contests could be at risk of losing the support of those who have sustained the industry, the mainstream consumer and the contests up till now. 

I know that if I was a producer of rindless cheeses I would be contemplating long and hard if I even wanted to risk an entry fee when competing with rinded cheeses. 

Are contests just about gastronomy? Perhaps they are. While the WCMA was running contests for much of it support base and ACS was running a contest for a fringe group we now have amazing cross over. 

Quietly the fringe group dipped its toes in the water over at the WCMA and started to come up with a medal or two or three for that matter. The extraordinary thing is that the success was not confined to a best of class (often created to cater to a more diverse range of offerings); they are taking best of show. 

At the ACS conference big names are appearing as entrants; folks who would have endorsed my description of the fringe group over at ACS are now signing on, they want to be a part of this new wave of appreciation for high value dairy products and want the endorsement of the governing body. Beyond that the mega corporations even want to be “Artisan”.

If I was a consumer of gastronomic cheeses I would be looking forward to the outcome of these two great contests every year. If I was a buyer, processor, shredder or private label operator I would be wondering where I could get an endorsement of the cheese that I manufacture or purchase for my operation. 

It appears that we need more classes, a separation of those cheeses made with rinds and those that are rindless. How long will it be before the contest governors have the judges scoring apples against apples rather than the apples and oranges scenario we have now?

This is not a criticism but a reflection on the evolution of these two great contests. Not everyone is going to want to buy a piece of rinded Cheddar, most of us will be buying rindless Cheddar for a very long time but will we be buying the best? 

So to close I would like to say to both the WCMA and the ACS, thank you for the opportunity. 

Neville McNaughton, president of Cheez Sorce, St. Louis, MO, has many years of experience manufacturing dairy products in both New Zealand and US. He has been a judge at several cheese competitions. Neville will be writing a regular column in Cheese Reporter and will take any questions regarding cheese manufacture. You can reach him at neville@cheezsorce.comjumhoefer@wischeesemakersassn. org

Other Neville McNaughton Columns
Designing A Farmstead Cheese Operation
Judges Recognize High Art in Cheesemaking
Cutting the Curd
One Day Analysis - Beyond Being Legal
The Shape of Cheese
Adding the Extra Column
Pasta Filata Cheese
Very Hard Cheese
Hard Cheese with Eyes
Gouda, Edam And Other Washed Curd Cheese

Other Cheese Reporter Guest Columnists
Visit Dan Strongin
Visit John Umhoefer