FDA Releases Final Supplemental Draft Guidance On Intentional Adulteration

The FDA released a supplemental draft guidance designed to support compliance with the intentional adulteration rule under the Food Safety Modernization Act.

The final rule on intentional adulteration addresses hazards that may be intentionally introduced to foods, including by acts of terrorism, with the intent to cause widespread harm to public health.

Unlike the other FSMA rules that address specific foods or hazards, the intentional adulteration rule requires the food industry to implement risk-reducing strategies for processes in food facilities that are significantly vulnerable to intentional adulteration.

This third and final installment of the intentional adulteration rule adds to the previously published draft guidance with chapters covering topics focusing on food defense corrective actions, food defense verification, reanalysis, and recordkeeping. This installment also includes appendices on FDA’s online Mitigation Strategies Database and how businesses can determine their status as a small or very small business under the rule.

Food facilities covered by the final rule are required to develop and implement a food defense plan that identifies vulnerabilities and mitigation strategies for those vulnerabilities. These facilities are also required to ensure that the mitigation strategies are working by implementing mitigation strategy management components.

Under the final rule, food companies must establish and implement written food defense corrective actions procedures that must be taken if mitigation strategies are not properly implemented. The food defense corrective actions procedures must describe the corrective action steps companies would take to ensure that appropriate action is taken to identify and correct a problem that has occurred with implementation of a mitigation strategy and, when necessary, to reduce the likelihood that the problem will recur.

Mitigation strategies are usually implemented to reduce access to the product at a particular point, to reduce the ability of an attacker to contaminate at that point, or both. Food defense corrective actions are intended to address situations where those strategies are not properly implemented.

Food defense verification is the application of methods, procedures, and other evaluations, in addition to food defense monitoring, to determine whether a mitigation strategy or combination of mitigation strategies is or has been operating as intended according to the food defense plan.

Food defense verification activities must be documented and must include, as appropriate to the nature of the mitigation strategy and its role in the facility’s food defense system: verification that food defense monitoring is being conducted; verification that appropriate decisions about food defense corrective actions are being made; verification that mitigation strategies are properly implemented and are significantly minimizing or preventing the significant vulnerabilities; and verification of reanalysis.

The purpose of the reanalysis is to determine whether a food defense plan (FDP) continues to be current and accurately reflects a company’s significant vulnerabilities and to determine whether mitigation strategies and mitigation strategy management components remain appropriate for a facility. A reanalysis of a company’s FDP as a whole must be...

For more on this story, visit

EDITORIAL COMMENT: Trade Wars Just Starting To Impact US Cheese, Butter Imports

US Commercial Disappearance In 2019: Cheese, Butter Set Records

Food Science In US Is Underfunded; IFT Wants Hike In Public, Private Research

GUEST COLUMNISTS: Perfect Day at the Dairy Forum by John Umhoefer, WCMA

COMPANY PROFILE: Alemar Cheese Moves To Minneapolis; Sister Company Grows In California

PREVIOUS COLUMNS: The Bakery Methods of Accounts Receivable: To Collect...Take a Number by Jen Pino-Gallagher, M3 Insurance

Key Factors Appear Positive For Prices, by Dr. Bob Cropp

‘Ending the War on Artisan Cheese’
A Book Review by Dan Strongin

‘Sir, There’s a Minnow in my Muenster’:
Recall Insurance Past And Present by Jim Brunker, M3 Insurance

Innovation Is Key To
Dairy Growth by Rebekah Sweeney

Boots On The Ground
by Jim Cisler

As FSMA Takes Full Effect, Partnership Opportunities Abound To Improve Food Safety Practices by Larry Bell and Jim Mueller


What do you think about
this week's  Story?

Please include an e-mail address if you would like a reply.

Please tell us if you are a
Dairy product manufacturer
Dairy marketer/importer/exporter
Milk producer
Supplier to manufacturers
and marketers